Hello Boost Users, I just upgraded from boost 1.38 to 1.39 on Mac OS X with darwin gcc 4.2.1 and noticed the following warnings: "g++" -ftemplate-depth-128 -O0 -fno-inline -Wall -g -dynamic -no-cpp-precomp -gdwarf-2 -arch x86_64 -fPIC -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_TEST_DYN_LINK -DSHARK_DEBUG -DSHARK_DYN_LINK -I"/Users/hauer/sys/boost_1_39-darwin-x86_64-xgcc42/include" -I"common/src" -I"utils/src" -c -o "utils/bin/darwin-4.2.1/debug/address-model-64/architecture-x86/test/shark/dtm/DateParserTest.o" "utils/test/shark/dtm/DateParserTest.cpp" /Users/hauer/sys/boost_1_39-darwin-x86_64-xgcc42/include/boost/test/floating_point_comparison.hpp:224: warning: ‘boost::test_tools::<unnamed>::check_is_close’ defined but not used /Users/hauer/sys/boost_1_39-darwin-x86_64-xgcc42/include/boost/test/floating_point_comparison.hpp:246: warning: ‘boost::test_tools::<unnamed>::check_is_small’ defined but not used Following the thread here: http://lists.boost.org/boost-users/2008/10/41326.php it seems that this was already something that got addressed a while ago and if I diff the header against 1.38 I notice this change for instance: namespace { -check_is_close_t const& check_is_close = unit_test::ut_detail::static_constant::value; +check_is_close_t check_is_close; } Is there a reason why the static_constant template was removed and you reverted back to the original version? Regards, Sebastian PS: Below the original message from Gennadiy were he mentioned he applied the static_constant patch. On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Gennadiy Rozental wrote:

Juergen Hunold writes:

...

On Wednesday 05 November 2008 19:20:37 Mat Marcus wrote:

...

On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Steven Watanabe This trick seemed to work at first, but then when I ran the 1.37.0 test tests I got:

..\..\libs\test\example\unit_test_example_10.cpp(75) : error C2039: 'check_is_close' : is not a member of 'boost::test_tools' ..\..\libs\test\example\unit_test_example_10.cpp(75) : error C2065: 'check_is_close' : undeclared identifier

Did you try my patch as described in #2390 ?

I've checked in patch along the line of what you proposed. Let's see if anything breaks.

Gennadiy

_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users