RE: [Boost-users] Re: Guidelines for effective exception usage
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/32cd1/32cd19442ccf0cb8ec33f8d94474fd1611c8b1de" alt=""
Peter Dimov
Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
OK, blunt point. the standard is (insert favorite expletive or "in error") if it allows use of std::runtime_error to terminate the program due to low memory situations (run out of memory (due to copying) during stack unwinding).
It does not allow such a thing.
This is an known and unresolved issue: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#254
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e462/7e462d7dd00158b0a067f8a3b23a8e5edd2e9dce" alt=""
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Peter Dimov
wrote: Victor A. Wagner Jr. wrote:
OK, blunt point. the standard is (insert favorite expletive or "in error") if it allows use of std::runtime_error to terminate the program due to low memory situations (run out of memory (due to copying) during stack unwinding).
It does not allow such a thing.
This is an known and unresolved issue: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#254
"The copy constructors of all exception-derived classes already have a no throw spec. Reference 18.6.1, 19.1 and 15.4/13."
From the above link.
participants (2)
-
Ben Hutchings
-
Peter Dimov