Re: [Boost-users] [Multi Index] equal_range from templated function fails to compile with gcc 4.6.1
Thanks for the quick reply, 51566 does seem very similar. I do not experience the issue from bug 9810 in any of the compilers where I have managed to reproduce the bug - from a quick look it looks somewhat different - and unfortunately changes to access_specifier.hpp don't solve the issue (changing the inheritance modifier or access modifiers in the derived class also does not seem to help). I experimented with a few changes but the only case that got rid of the error was the obvious change of making node_type public in index_base.hpp. In terms of gcc versions - so far I have reproduced the issue with 4.6.1, 4.6.2 and 4.5.2. Jacob.
Jacob Metcalfe <cubathy <at> gmail.com> writes:
Thanks for the quick reply,
51566 does seem very similar. I do not experience the issue from bug 9810 in any of the compilers where I have managed to reproduce the bug - from a quick look it looks somewhat different - and unfortunately changes to access_specifier.hpp don't solve the issue (changing the inheritance modifier or access modifiers in the derived class also does not seem to help).
I experimented with a few changes but the only case that got rid of the error was the obvious change of making node_type public in index_base.hpp.
I'm sorry this didn't work. Given that the error seems somewhat spurious (i.e. hard to reproduce) I'm reluctant to apply the wholesale workaround of changing node_type to public in index_base. If you can live with applying this patch locally I'd rather leave it like that. Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica Digital
Yes, I don't think it makes sense to apply this work around, at least for the time being. I'll keep an eye on the gcc bug and try some other changes at some point. Thanks. On Jan 9, 2012 9:48 PM, "Joaquin M Lopez Munoz" <joaquin@tid.es> wrote:
Jacob Metcalfe <cubathy <at> gmail.com> writes:
Thanks for the quick reply,
51566 does seem very similar. I do not experience the issue from bug
9810 in
any of the compilers where I have managed to reproduce the bug - from a quick look it looks somewhat different - and unfortunately changes to access_specifier.hpp don't solve the issue (changing the inheritance modifier or access modifiers in the derived class also does not seem to help).
I experimented with a few changes but the only case that got rid of the error was the obvious change of making node_type public in index_base.hpp.
I'm sorry this didn't work. Given that the error seems somewhat spurious (i.e. hard to reproduce) I'm reluctant to apply the wholesale workaround of changing node_type to public in index_base. If you can live with applying this patch locally I'd rather leave it like that.
Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica Digital
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
participants (2)
-
Jacob Metcalfe -
Joaquin M Lopez Munoz