"stefan_felkel2000" <Stefan.Felkel@cim-team.de> writes:

Hi all,

Since I have included boost\dynamic_bitset.hpp in my project, PC-Lint reports many thousands of redefinitions of symbol 'is_same_part_1<<1>>::part_2<<1>> for the following code in type_traits\is_same.hpp.

#ifdef BOOST_MSVC // the following VC6 specific implementation is *NOT* legal // C++, but has the advantage that it works for incomplete // types.

template< typename T1 > struct is_same_part_1 { template<typename T2> struct part_2 { enum { value = false }; }; template<> struct part_2<T1> { enum { value = true }; }; };

If I replace

#ifdef BOOST_MSVC

with

#if (defined BOOST_MSVC) && (BOOST_MSVC < 1300)

The code compiles with Visual Studio .NET 2003 and PC-Lint doesn't report any error.

This is an odd request, since Visual Studio .NET 2003 never compiles that part of the file as BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION is not defined for VC7.1. To make PC-Lint happy I was going to check in a patch, but then it occurred to me: this code *is* nonconforming, so a lint tool *should* complain when it's encountered. So I guess the question is: why is your PC-Lint not configured to emulate your VC7.1 compiler? If it was, it would never see that code either. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com