24 May
2005
24 May
'05
1:59 p.m.
Caleb Epstein wrote:
I'm not certain, but I would guess that overhead is the reason. Perhaps someone more closely involved in the implementation (Peter?) would care to comment.
As a user of scoped_ptr and scoped_array, I expressed a strong opinion that its memory usage remain as is, and some Boost developers agreed. If you have a way to maintain the current behavior (speed and memory footprint) as a default, you are welcome to add functionality. Otherwise, it becomes useless to me. -- Dick Hadsell 914-259-6320 Fax: 914-259-6499 Reply-to: hadsell@blueskystudios.com Blue Sky Studios http://www.blueskystudios.com 44 South Broadway, White Plains, NY 10601