On 7 Feb 2015 at 3:12, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:

> > But comparing thread-safe implementations with implementations that
> > are not thread-safe seems a bit unfair to me.
>
> Is it reallistic that folks would want a variant of signals that's not
> threadsafe, trading some callback restrictions for performance?

I think a version which is compile time switchable is the ideal.