5 Jun
2002
5 Jun
'02
10:08 p.m.
"Mark Storer" <mstorer@cardiff.com> wrote in message news:E840F0B7E6189547BDB91DA8BF2228AB016253F7@csmail.cardiff.com...
I'm guessing the author, Dave Abrahams, didn't think anyone was going to declare a noncopyable*, so decided to pass on that little bit of extra overhead involved in declaring a destructor virtual. Or it could be a mistake.
Dave has posted to this list at least once... So tell us, did you mean to leave it non-virtual?
Absolutely, totally.