16 Mar
2011
16 Mar
'11
10:02 a.m.
On 15/Mar - 20:07, rhapsodyn wrote:
Yes, i considered the "don't call start_accept() if (limit > threshold)" idea.(in fact, only with accept.close(), i can avoid the unexpected extra client) But when some "active" connection becoming "inactive", how can i restart the accept action? with another thread? It seems weird, because i thought there has to be a accept thread "always running" on server :0
I don't know the design of our whole server but you must deal with client disconnection (and decrease limit in this case ). If limit get under the threshold, just accept new connection. -- Arnaud Degroote PhD Student RIA LAAS / CNRS