Re: [Boost-users] boost libraries and gcc-2.95 on linux

on Mon Jul 16 2007, "Dmitry Teslenko" wrote:

Hello!

On 16/07/07, David Abrahams wrote:

...

It is supported by some libraries -- mostly older ones. Many newer libraries are being written without support for nonconforming compilers that are over 6 years old ;-)

Well, I see. Is it documented somewhere?

Not really. Normally, if someone were running the regression tests against 2.95, we'd see the results here: http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/1_34_0/user/summary_releas... ...hmm... There is some useful information in http://boost.org/status/explicit-failures-markup.xml If you can decipher it ;-) Search for 2.95 and you'll see the tests that are expected to fail. Most other places, you can expect 2.95 to be supported. However, new libraries in 1.34 may have never been marked up for 2.95 The best way to find out what works is to run the regression tests yourself: http://www.boost.org/tools/regression/xsl_reports/runner/instructions.html -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com The Astoria Seminar ==> http://www.astoriaseminar.com