Re: [Boost-users] [phoenix] another problem with member_variable bind

7 Nov 2008

      Ok, my bad. What would be your solution?

For instance, I changed over to std::for_each but still need a
separate function to do the actual multiplication plus assignment.

struct point
{
    double _prob;
    double _x;
};

void mul_assign( double& l, const double& f )
{
    l *= f;
}

int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{
    using namespace std;
    using namespace boost::phoenix;
    using namespace boost::phoenix::arg_names;

    vector< point > points( 1 );

    std::for_each( points.begin()
                 , points.end()
                 , bind( &mul_assign, bind( &point::_prob, arg1 ), 2.0 )
                 );

    return 0;
}

Is there a way I could get rid off "mul_assign"?

Thanks,
Christian

On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Steven Watanabe <watanabesj@gmail.com> wrote:
...
AMDG
Christian Henning wrote:
...
vector< point > points;
// doesn't work
   std::transform( points.begin()
                 , points.end()
                 , points.begin()
                 , bind( &point::_prob, arg1 ) * val( 2.0 )
                 );
Certainly, it won't work.  You're code does the equivalent of:
points[i] = points[i]._prob * 2.0
In Christ,
Steven Watanabe
_______________________________________________
Boost-users mailing list
Boost-users@lists.boost.org
http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users