[Boost-users] Re: MPL Question on crossing the compile \ runtimebarrier with bind | adding to boost profiler abstracted file access

"Brian Braatz" writes:

[Brian Braatz Writes:]

As always THANK YOU Dave

What about the boost\Lambda.bind vs MPL bind?.

I don't know what you're asking.

Is there a way to write the

Tyepdef MyClass

As a MPL driven expression,

I don't know what "MPL driven" means, but...

or is the "typeof" the only option

Yes, it's the only option if you want to get the type of bind(...) into that template argument list. You need to pass it through typeof, since bind(...) is always a runtime expression.

(I am ignoring the hand coded functor option). (I am asking partially because I am having a hard time "seeing" the difference between the MPL lambda and the boost lambda-

MPL composes (compile-time) metafunctions Boost.Lambda composes (runtime) functions

I will keep re-reading the MPL book... :) ) (also don't get me wrong, the typeof looks very cool- I am just trying to connect the dots)

(do you parenthesize everything?) (just wondering.) (it's all about s-expressions)-ly y'rs, Dave -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com