
19 Mar
2010
19 Mar
'10
3:36 p.m.
Sean McAllister wrote:
Hmmm, I've only got the one extra thread to run the asynchronous event loop in. If I have async_read events outstanding, wouldn't the above code cause my destructor to block until I've read another message (which may happen quite infrequently)?
That's right -- but you still would like to have all operations finished before the end of the destructor. If you need to close sockets, call, e.g., socket::close. Cheers, Rutger