Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
What does defining/not defining BOOST_DISABLE_THREADS have to do with the Boost ABI?
It changes the the internal layout of some Boost types, as well as their behaviour. So if we're being asked for a single binary, it had better be thread safe. John.
If currently the only effect of selecting threading=multi/single is whether Pthreads is linked/not linked, then the macro just reflects this into the world of Boost.Config. Is by chance BOOST_HAS_THREADS affecting the lib suffixes used in autolinking mode? If so, maybe the solution is to just adjust the autolinking in Linux appropriately. Sorry if I'm missing something obvious here --I'm sure I am :)
Joaquín M López Muñoz Telefónica, Investigación y Desarrollo
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.9.1/1781 - Release Date: 11/11/2008 08:59