Re: [Boost-users] [integer] Request: long long (64 bits) supportfor int_t and uint_t

Scott McMurray (me22) wrote:

...

Given the fact that is part of Boost already, it would make sense to me to allow easy access to its integer types by means of a templated struct like int_exact.

Agreed.

Thanks :-)

I suppose there might be value in making them meta-functions, with just ::type

Okay, so instead we could have a templated struct int_exact<Bits>, containing just one type, taken from : template <unsigned Bits> struct int_exact { }; template <> struct int_exact<8> { typedef int8_t type; }; template <> struct int_exact<16> { typedef int16_t type; }; template <> struct int_exact<32> { typedef int32_t type; }; #ifndef BOOST_NO_INT64_T template <> struct int_exact<64> { typedef int64_t type; }; #endif and a similar struct uint_exact: template <unsigned Bits> struct uint_exact { }; template <> struct uint_exact<8> { typedef uint8_t type; }; template <> struct uint_exact<16> { typedef uint16_t type; }; template <> struct uint_exact<32> { typedef uint32_t type; }; #ifndef BOOST_NO_INT64_T template <> struct uint_exact<64> { typedef uint64_t type; }; #endif And possibly similar structs providing int_least<Bits>::type, uint_least<Bits>::type, int_fast<Bits>::type, and uint_fast<Bits>::type, retrieving their types directly from . Those structs would be very helpful to me already, and they could serve as building blocks for whatever clever meta-functions. But what are the chances of getting those structs into the Boost Integer Library? I'm not a Boost developer myself. So I guess all I could do is just drop another ticket at http://svn.boost.org/trac/boost Or would it be more effective to write some kind of proposal?

I'm wondering about a special thing like this: template struct stdint_t { typedef U type; } template <typename U = void> struct stdint_t<32,U> { typedef int32_t type; } // and etc

Not completely clear to me...

Suppose that we just went and used the cstdint.hpp method. Would we then just using uint_t<N> = uint_exact_t< ((N-1)|7)+1 >; Since all the types we know about would be multiples of 8 bits?

Hmmm... I don't really understand this formula either: (((N-1)|7)+1)

...

int_exact

BTW: CHAR_BIT or integer_traits<unsigned char>::digits, not 8 :P

Oops! You're absolutely right! I was very very bad ;-)

/usr/include/boost/xpressive/traits/cpp_regex_traits.hpp has "define an unsigned integral typedef of the same size as std::ctype_base::mask" So this does seem like a good suggestion.

Easy to implement, too: template <typename T> struct unsigned_ { BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(integer_traits<T>::is_specialized); // and maybe BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT(integer_traits<T>::is_signed); typedef uint_exact_t::type type; }; template <typename T> unsigned_<T> make_unsigned(T x) { return unsigned_<T>(x); }

I'm afraid I will lose the value of my argument (x), when passing it to make_unsigned, because it returns a struct that doesn't have any data! But at least it will get me the right unsigned type :-)

Or maybe a new metafunction, int_size_as<T> = int_exact_t;

That's possible... BTW, I think we might drop the "_t", and call the struct "int_exact", instead of "int_exact_t", when the typedef is simply called "type". Because IMO int_exact<32>::type is clear enough. :-) So... any suggestions on how to get those simple structs like int_exact and uint_exact into the Boost Integer Library? Kind regards, Niels