21 Nov
2009
21 Nov
'09
5:53 p.m.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 7:07 PM, Michael Fawcett
I'm unsure of the focus of GGL. Given the current offering, I don't think GGL is an appropriate name. I don't think Boost.Polygon is appropriate either. IMVHO Boost.Polygon should be Boost.VLSI and Luke can drop floating point support if he believes it offers no benefits to that domain (I'm sure he would love less work :) ).
The paragraph above is way too random! Each of us can not come up with one idea of what a library should be, and Boost already clarifies what the high level requirements should be. From the home page: "Boost libraries are intended to be widely useful, and usable across a broad spectrum of applications." regards