Re: [Boost-users] boost::lambda::bind - a better name?

Maciek Godek wrote:

Wouldn't it be better if boost::lambda::bind was named boost::lambda::call (or boost::lambda::eval, to make it more lispish), in order to:

I think you can make a better argument for calling it papply as it is a generalised partial application function, but personally I find the name bind OK. K