Re: boost::pool + shared memory

--- In Boost-Users@y..., Tom Matelich <tmatelich@z...> wrote:

Looks like pool may not be what I need, darn. I like to weasel as many boost classes into my project as possible.

I've got a similar question -- I've got a whole pile of strings that I want to share between processes, and I was thinking a reference- counted string implementation with the actual data in shared memory would be a good way to do that. Do you think a memory pool placed in shared memory, with the string class modified to allocate/deallocate there would work?