24 Jun
2009
24 Jun
'09
12:56 p.m.
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 04:24:01PM +0200, Stephan Menzel wrote:
No. But what I am planning instead is to provide a class adapter with user defined getters/setters. Would that help?
It would, if such construct would be a little more flexible than the macro. I don't want to complain about it since it does the job but sometimes I just like to save the hassle with a data only transfer struct and parse directly into a class without having all members public.
I currently use the "transfer struct" method as well to get around this issue and therefore would like to articulate my interest in such an adapter as well. Matthias -- Matthias Vallentin vallentin@icsi.berkeley.edu http://www.icir.org/matthias