"David Abrahams" wrote in message
news:uis42sxdl.fsf@boost-consulting.com...
| "Thorsten Ottosen" writes:
| > Can you confirm that this would remove the present problems with gcc?
|
| I seriously doubt it. The problem is that GCC looks up all names the
| same way, even if they're not functions. The only cure is for clients
| to isolate types from one another in separate sub-namespaces, and
but we will have boost::end() and boost::mpl::end<>. Shouldn't that be enough?
The problem before was unqualified calls to end() as I understood it. That
will not
be needed for ADL to kick in anymore.
-Thorsten
