9 Dec
2010
9 Dec
'10
7:17 p.m.
KTC wrote:
On 09/12/2010 17:26, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
I'm sure the intention was good, but the result and/or release notes didn't produce a BIG ENOUGH warning.
(Or it is that one should *always* rebuild bjam in case?)
Well it didn't help that the bjam binary link right above the 1.45 release link on the website apparently doesn't build 1.45.
We'll pull those links for 1.46. - Volodya