That appears to be the definition of what license they wanted, not the actual license. The license body makes it unclear if I can use this in a closed-source commercial environment On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 3:51 PM, <boost-users-request@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Message: 5 Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2017 17:54:04 +0100 From: Mateusz Loskot <mateusz@loskot.net> To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] License questions Message-ID: <CABUeae_a-cNCdw00fYN4Gyb_a7Gk_QOo7cARXNo3Lh8eXAAVtQ@ mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
On 23 March 2017 at 17:38, Julian D. via Boost-users <boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
I am making a confidential commercial closed-source program, and Boost's libraries seem useful for me. I can't tell if the Boost license allows me to include it in closed-source. Would anybody know?
http://www.boost.org/users/license.html#requirements
2nd bullet
Best regards, -- Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net