On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Ralph Gauges wrote:
Jeremiah Willcock wrote:
By the way, origin and extent were actually completely unused parameters in many cases, and are now in the topology for the places where they're needed. These changes are in r56654. Could you please try that version out?
-- Jeremiah Willcock _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
Setting the origin and the extent to the center of the topology did not make any difference. I also tried r56654 and I noticed that the origin and extent parameters to fruchterman reingold have been removed again. After changing the call, I could compile it against the revision 56654, but the result was the same as for boost 1.40 release. All my nodes we placed at almost exactly the same spot. Compiling the same code (just using the old calls to random layout and fruchterman) against boost 1.35 which is the version on my linux box gives me nicely distributed nodes at the edge of the box/topology.
Sorry, either I am doing something horribly stupid, or there might be a bug in the reingold algo.
Is there anything else, I could do to help locate the problem?
Just to follow up on the list, we did some off-list debugging and a new version of Fruchterman-Reingold is now committed in SVN. -- Jeremiah Willcock