[Boost-users] Re: [Signals] Named slot group usage?

Douglas Gregor wrote:

Background: Signals performance is sub-par, and much of the problem can be traced back to support for named slot groups. I'm trying to determine the best way to proceed.

I would be surprised if the poor memory performance is caused by the named slot groups (from what tiny bit I know about it). Of course the speed performance is just as important. FWIW our company makes no use of the named slot groups. I'm very much looking forward to your changes (I'm currently using a sigc that's been hacked to have (mostly) the same interface as boost)! Thanks, Neal