Hi there,
I have a class that is being serialized in regular intervals. It contains a
vector . As the somefunctionObject objects
can maintain state, I want to be able to serialize them along with the
surrounding class. This works fine with the current design.
I would find it much more pleasing to replace the above vector e.g. with a
vector >. From the program logic this would
have the same effect, but would be more elegant.
I can not see, though, how serialization would work in this case. As far as
I know it is not possible to retrieve the object back from boost::function.
And it is also not possible to specify more than one interface to
boost::function, e.g. in order to support two operator() with different
signatures like this:
"boost::function f;"
If that was possible, I could just give the function object a "clone"
function and write my own (de-)serialization code.
Any ideas ?
Thanks and Best Regards,
Ruediger Berlich
