Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
Steven Watanabe wrote:
Joel de Guzman wrote:
Thanks, Steven. Please feel free to apply the patch.
I've started adding this to bind_member_variable_tests.cpp and I'm running into more problems than I expected. I'll get back to you.
I'm stuck here:
struct x { int m; };
// instantiates member_variable::result<x>, // but calls member_variable::operator()(const x&). bind(&x::m, x())();
// instantiates member_variable::result<x> because // top level references are stripped. bind(&x::m, ref(x));
There is no way for result to distinguish between these cases, even though they are different.
Out of curiosity, how does Boost.Bind and Lambda.Bind behave in this regard? Regards, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boostpro.com http://spirit.sf.net