Sean Huang wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeff Garland"
To: Sent: Sunday, October 01, 2006 11:35 PM Subject: Re: [Boost-users] 64bit windows regression failure (was [date_time]time zone input) So basically this is a non-failure. I suppose I could bump up the loop count...or you could get a slower machine ;-)
I see. In light of this, isn't it better to change the test from "<" to "<="?
Well I've considered that in the past when this has come up, but always decided against it on the thought that I would rather see the error if the clock didn't actually increment correctly. So I would be worried if the sequence was something like: 0 0 0 0 0 10 If you have a minute, change the for loop in test/posix_time/testmicrosec_time_clock.cpp for (int j=0; j<100000; j++) { // some systems loop too fast so "last is less" tests fail maybe make 100000 into 500000 and see if the test passes. Jeff