Re: [Boost-users] Boost Logos: proposed high constrast logo

Alfredo, Apologies I failed to point out which are the high contrast variants in my previous mail: https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_WA6oW88X1UNWEwOTdhNGMtMDJjNi00MzllLThhMzctYzc0YTVhNzE0ZGI0&sort=name&layout=list&num=50 Please see the "boost-hc-black.psd" and "boost-hc-white.psd". It should be trivial to crop down the symbol part of the logo, or make any color related modifications. Let me know if you need further help with it. Regards, Zoltan On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 9:06 PM, alfC wrote:

On Oct 7, 1:03 pm, Zoltan Juhasz wrote:

...

Follow up on the original topic:

I've uploaded a high-contrast version of the BoostLogo, and moved all otherlogorelated resources to the follow Google Docs folder:

https://docs.google.com/leaf?id=0B_WA6oW88X1UZWZiNzUwYzctYzg1NS00ZmY5...

Ok, thank you for your work. This is not what I was thinking when I asked for a logo. To me the logo is the three hexagon at the left of the word "Boost", which is still not high contrats, it is just a dark background. Anyway, I think what you did can be useful for some webpages. Nevermind the "high contrast" logo it may not worth the effort as someone said.

...

The point is, it is not thelogowhich defines Boost, but the other way around.

I agree. If this were a soda brand the logo would be important. but since Boost has content then the logo is less important. But consistency is still important that I why I asked for opinions in a high contrast "three hexagons".

Without Boost, C++ would be just a bunch of good intentions.

Alfredo _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users