Re: [Boost-users] [1.33.1][test][vc80]newuserquestionconcerning1_33_1\libs\test\doc\examples\unit_test_example1.html&unit_test_example1.cpp/

Hi Grennadiy, thanks for your help so far. I might just switch to the no libraries solution and wait for 1.34 binaries to be built, since I don't have time on my schedule to dig deeper into the boost build. Correct me if I'm wrong - if I chose to use the synchronous exceptions version of the libraries now on Boost Consulting website, the core libraries ought to work fine, it is just that I ought to expect runtime exceptions to terminate the execution of any code I write using it. Ie please confirm that there's no reason to think that boost-test, etc might not function with this exception model. Just on the no-libraries solution. I can't find anything documented about any special compiler settings to get it to work with vc80. When I set /EHsc, the popped up exception occurs. When I set /EHa, the program _appears_ to finish fine, but on closer inspection of the console output, I discover the access violation message is there in the console. But I guess this is not what I should get with my no-libraries test. What am I doing wrong here? -- OUTPUT: $ ./Boost_test_1_withoutSeparateLibrary.exe Running 1 test case... d:/john/syncfolder/projects/programming/c++/vc++/projects/boost_test_1/boost_test_1/getstarted.cpp(13): error in "free_te st_function": check 3 == 1 failed unknown location(0): fatal error in "free_test_function": memory access violation *** 1 failure detected (1 failure expected) in test suite "Unit test example 1" --- #include using boost::unit_test::test_suite; void free_test_function(){ BOOST_CHECK(3 == 1); int* p = (int*)0; *p = 0;} test_suite* init_unit_test_suite( int, char* [] ) { test_suite* test= BOOST_TEST_SUITE( "Unit test example 1" ); test->add( BOOST_TEST_CASE( &free_test_function ), 1 /* expected one error */ ); return test;}