Can anyone offer me hints on how to get started in resolving
--- In Boost-Users@yahoogroups.com, "Gennadiy E. Rozental <rogeeff@m...>" <rogeeff@m...> wrote: these?
Use latest cvs. It should be fixed already by Dave.
I'm willing to build a toolset file for this compiler, but I don't
There is one in tools section. I was using it to compile a lot of libraries with Sunpro 6
Assertion: (../lnk/tmplmatchargs.cc, line 153) while processing /opt/src/freeware/boost/boost/type_traits/is_base_and_derived.hpp at
Thanks, I'm just returning from a week away, so I apologize for not maintaining the continuity of the thread. I was able to use cvs to grab the latest version and (semi)successfully used bjam to build the libraries. Initially, I'm most interested in the date_time functions, but eventually I'm sure we'll want to use additional modules. Building with both Workshop 6 update 2, and Workshop 7 give some errors in the global bjam build (I'll included these later). The date_time library appears to compile, but when I then try to compile one of the example programs I get the following errors: nautilus.35> CC -c -DBOOST_REGEX_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_REGEX_STATIC_LINK=1 -g -xtarget=generic +d -features=rtti -features=except -I"/opt/src/freeware/boost" days_alive.cpp "/opt/src/freeware/boost/boost/type_traits/is_convertible.hpp", line 191: Warning (Anachronism): Type names qualified by template parameters require "typename". "/opt/src/freeware/boost/boost/type_traits/is_convertible.hpp", line 191: Warning (Anachronism): Type names qualified by template parameters require "typename". "/opt/src/freeware/boost/boost/type_traits/is_convertible.hpp", line 191: Warning (Anachronism): Type names qualified by template parameters require "typename". "/opt/src/freeware/boost/boost/type_traits/is_convertible.hpp", line 191: Warning (Anachronism): Type names qualified by template parameters require "typename". line 87 I've tried the -features= flag with the normal and no% forms of anachronisms, extensions, and transitions, and none of these make a difference in getting this sample program to compile. The global build produces a lot of output; I've recognized two distinct error patterns. One is very similar to the above (Anachronism) warning, but for other source code files, and the other pattern includes messages like: CC -c -DBOOST_REGEX_NO_LIB=1 -DBOOST_REGEX_STATIC_LINK=1 -g -xtarget=generic +d -features=rtti -features=except -I"libs/regex/build" -I"/opt/src/freeware/boost" -o "libs/regex/build/bin/libboost_regex.a/sunpro/debu g/runtime-link-dynamic/winstances.o" "libs/regex/build/../src/winstances.cpp" ...failed sunpro-C++-action libs/regex/build/bin/libboost_regex.a/sunpro/debug /runtime-link-dynamic/winstances.o... ...skipped <libs!regex!build/libboost_regex.a/sunpro/debug/ru ntime-link-dynamic>libboost_regex_debug.a for lack of <libs!regex!build/libboost_regex.a/sunpro/debug/ru ntime-link-dynamic>libboost_regex_debug.a(winstances.o)... ...skipped <!libs!regex!build!bin-stage>libboost_regex_debug.a for lack of <libs!regex!build/libboost_regex.a/sunpro/debug/ru ntime-link-dynamic>libboost_regex_debug.a... FileClone libs/regex/build/bin-stage/libboost_regex.a sunpro-C++-action libs/regex/build/bin/libboost_regex.so/sunpro/debu g/runtime-link-dynamic/winstances.o "/opt/src/freeware/boost/boost/detail/allocator.hpp", line 107: Error: boost::detail::allocator<char>::allocator<wchar_t>(const boost::detail::allocator<wchar_t>&) and boost::detail::allocator<char>::allocator<wchar_t>(const boost::detail::allocator<wchar_t>&) have same extern name "__1cFboostGdetailJallocator4Cc_2t4Cw_6Mrkn0BJallocator4CTB___v_". "/opt/src/freeware/boost/boost/regex/v3/instances.hpp", line 143: Where: While instantiating "boost::re_detail::match_results_base<const wchar_t*, boost::detail::allocator<wchar_t>>::match_results_base(const boost::detail::allocator<wchar_t>&)". "/opt/src/freeware/boost/boost/regex/v3/instances.hpp", line 143: Where: Instantiated from non-template code. So... If anyone has any suggestions on what I need to tell the Workshop compiler to accept this code, or how I should modify the code to get at least the date_time package to compile, please let me know. Thank you