Thanks for your valuable feedback. I added initial versions of tutorial and user-guide to README. It's not ideal yet but it's a start. * https://github.com/boost-experimental/ut#tutorial * https://github.com/boost-experimental/ut#user-guide I also updated benchmarks with Boost.Test-1.71.0 (static library). I didn't add Boost.LightweightTest though as it's just assertions (no tests/suites/etc...) so it makes it difficult to compare due to missing features. * https://github.com/boost-experimental/ut#benchmarks I hope that helps a bit. Thanks again, Kris On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 1:17 AM Richard Hodges via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
It looks very interesting. The idea of not using macros is very appealing to me.
From looking at the examples, I get the feeling of "I could probably use this".
However, as the other commenters have mentioned, without a tutorial and full reference it's difficult to judge whether it's ready for use in production.
Are there plans to develop this?
On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 at 16:24, Krzysztof Jusiak via Boost-users < boost-users@lists.boost.org> wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering whether there is any interest in exploring a C++20 single header/single module, macro-free Unit Testing Framework with no dependencies?
Github: https://github.com/boost-experimental/ut
Additional links: - Try it online: https://godbolt.org/z/uVDxkW - Benchmarks: https://github.com/boost-experimental/ut#benchmarks - How it works?: https://github.com/boost-experimental/ut#how-it-works
Thanks, Kris _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
-- Richard Hodges hodges.r@gmail.com office: +442032898513 home: +376841522 mobile: +376380212
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org https://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users