Hi, My review is here.
* What is your evaluation of the design?
I think it is important, emulating move semantics and emplace inserter.
* What is your evaluation of the implementation?
Some requirements added in C++0x (see 23.2.1 in n3290). Does Boost.Container satisfy, partial or not? (just question) I anxious about 23.2.1/8 especially. And associated to the requirements, do you have any plans to provide allocator_traits?
* What is your evaluation of the documentation?
1) There are no documentation about free functions. (operators, swap, ... 2) The documentation of deque::push_[back|front] are missing. 3) Some member functions are not documented about Returns/Effects, Complexity or Throws. (ex: after No.23 in basic_string) Please check it.
* What is your evaluation of the potential usefulness of the
library? Very good! It can replace STL container easily.
* Did you try to use the library? With what compiler? Did you have
any
problems? No, I only read documents and source code.
* How much effort did you put into your evaluation? A glance? A
quick
reading? In-depth study? A quick reading for C++03 developer. And a glance for C++0x developer.
* Are you knowledgeable about the problem domain?
I am using STL containers (including C++0x's one), but not expert about implementations and algorithms.
And finally, every review should answer this question:
* Do you think the library should be accepted as a Boost library? Be sure to say this explicitly so that your other comments don't obscure your overall opinion. I think should be accepted it with improved documentations.
Thanks, -- TAKAHASHI Kohei College of Information Science, University of Tsukuba private mail: flast@flast.jp others: flast@ac-room.org s0911476@coins.tsukuba.ac.jp