20 Jul
2011
20 Jul
'11
7:11 a.m.
on Mon Jul 18 2011, "Hartmut Kaiser"
If Boost.Lockfree will be accepted, it won't be merged into trunk before Boost.Atomic is accepted.
That seems unnecessary. Can't Boost.Lockfree simply include (a version of) Boost.Atomic as an implementation detail for now? -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com