[Boost-users] Re: tokenizer and wstring with VC7.1

On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:36:54 -0000, Keith MacDonald wrote:

Hmmm. I've been trying to use various members of the boost library as black boxes, but this issue highlights the danger of doing so. I suppose a language keyword is needed to specify when a non-temporary object is required as an actual parameter. Given that there's no such thing, perhaps it would be safer to eliminate such convenience constructors from the library?

I think that simplest thing to do would be to explain the problem in tokenizer documentation. B. PS. There is a chance that C++ will be enriched with syntax allowing to detect rvalue (temporary value) used as function parameter, see: http://std.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2002/n1377.htm