"Andy Little"
"David Abrahams"
wrote in message news:u3bi7705a.fsf@boost-consulting.com... "Andy Little"
writes: "David Abrahams" wrote
"Andy Little" writes:
I wouldn't care much what you said, except for that you're doing this in a thread where impressionable "newbies" are reading, and I don't want them to misunderstand the library design or the implementation decisions and their costs/benefits.
I can continue in private if you wish ?
If you feel the need to continue to label the transform behavior as sloppy without justification, then that would be better. Otherwise, either explain how transform could be better or, please, just retract your remark about the behavior of transform for the record.
I retract the remark which referred to mpl::transform as sloppy. I offer my sincere apologies to anyone who may have taken offense.
Thank you, that helps focus the discussion. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com