5 Dec
2007
5 Dec
'07
2:41 a.m.
on Tue Dec 04 2007, Joel de Guzman
John Torjo wrote:
* What is your evaluation of the design?
simple and effective. I'd like to see more tweakable parameters for specific uses. I frequently deal with different number expansions in a case to case basis. For example, is it possible to have arity 3 for function X and arity-5 for function Y? A single number seems wasteful if I'm sure that a certain use needs only a few. Is that possible?
It generates one template definition. You could generate a bunch of different templates for different uses but I don't see much advantage; it would probably slow down compilation overall. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting http://www.boost-consulting.com