Re: [Boost-users] Building boost_1.34.1 on mac os X 10.5 64 bit.

2008/10/27 Alexander Sack :

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 9:26 PM, Alain Leblanc wrote:

...

2008/10/27 Alexander Sack :

...

...

Do you mean combined instead of x86? Using combined as a value for either the address model or the architecture returns a message indicating that it is not a valid value.

Well I haven't done combined but what about 64 for address-model?

-aps

Same result. With

./tools/jam/src/bin.macosxx86/bjam architecture=x86 address-model=combined install

produces

...

error: "combined" is not a known value of feature <address-model> error: legal values: "16" "32" "64"

...

and the same result with adding --toolset-darwin to the command line.

Yes but if you do address-model=64, does that work? I would assume so. I don't think "combined" is going to work.

-aps _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users

I tried all the combinations of address-model=[64|combined] architecture=[x86|combined|<nothing>] --toolset=darwin | <nothing> Omitting --toolset=darwin gives me a warning that gcc is used but does not change the result. Omitting the architecture parameter with address-model=64 will compile but the resulting libraries are 32 bits. With architecture=x86 and address-model=64 I get the message ' error: CPU you selected does not support x86-64 instruction set.' I'll download 1.36 and see if it willcompile. I think that all I need to change to my code is a method that changed name in the filesystem library. It may be faster than trying to compile 1.34. a