Kirit Sælensminde wrote:
So far I think the documentation is pretty good. One thing that I especially like (and I wish more of the Boost documentation would do) is to list the required headers with each example.
Maybe I should put a hyperlink to example cpp file.
I agree though that adding egg:: to the egg members would probably make things clearer.
Ok.
I like the Haskell examples for egg::nest, but didn't notice that the documentation was explicit about stating it was Haskell - some probably won't recognise it.
I should put some hyperlink about haskell notation.
Really I need to have a good play around with it, but I don't know when I will have time to do so :( Almost certainly not in the next two weeks though.
The review manager will consider it. :-) Regards, -- Shunsuke Sogame