Hi Matthieu, I considered Eigen, but have already invested a lot of time/effort with ublas. The main issue with Eigen is that it did not provide (at least at first sight) with any handling of the allocator.uBLAS does so through the unbounded_array input and this is very useful in overwriting allocation functionality. Also, I am really looking for wrapping LAPACK, since I don’t believe in rewriting code that is mature, works very well and has been optimized over a long period of time ( as happens with mkl ) and covers a plethora of numerical algorithms (as LAPACK does). But, there should be an answer within the uBLAS confines, right? Thank you for your help, Petros From: Matthieu Brucher Sent: Saturday, October 22, 2011 1:43 PM To: boost-users@lists.boost.org Subject: Re: [Boost-users] ublas speed and multi-core processors Hi, You may want to try Eigen instead. Matthieu Brucher 2011/10/22 petros <pmamales@nyc.rr.com> Hi, Is there any way to use ublas taking advantage of the multi-core facility of current processors? Even naive “strategies”, like breaking the number of rows of a targeted matrix expression across different threads would improve performance significantly, even if not optimally. It would be nice to be able to use the matrix expression templates to perform operations in a multi-threaded way. Is there any provision for this? Thank you for your help, Petros _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users -- Information System Engineer, Ph.D. Blog: http://matt.eifelle.com LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/matthieubrucher -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users