29 Sep
2011
29 Sep
'11
9:05 a.m.
Nathan Ridge wrote:
I would suggest making your case about the default constructibility of forward iterators at comp.std.c++. If you gain consensus there that this requirement is indeed misguided, then your request will carry more weight here.
Greater minds than mine did and failed (by being ignored); who am I to confront such a valiant enemy? My only hope is to smuggle common sense under the radar ;-) Chris