8 Apr
2009
8 Apr
'09
2:53 a.m.
oh sorry, forgot to mention, after vector< Graph& > subG; I should have something like: subG.resize(2); subG(0) = G.subgraph(); and subgraph() returns a Graph& On 7 abr, 21:04, "James C. Sutherland" <James.Sutherl...@utah.edu> wrote:
On Apr 7, 2009, at 4:59 PM, fabricio wrote:
typedef subgraph< adjacency_list > Graph;
Graph G;
what I want is to create a:
vector< Graph& > subG;
but the usage of & here is illegal.
Why not use pointers? vector<Graph*> subG; or vector< boost::shared_ptr<Graph> > subG; _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-us...@lists.boost.orghttp://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users