Re: [Boost-users] a vector of subgraphs

oh sorry, forgot to mention, after vector< Graph& > subG; I should have something like: subG.resize(2); subG(0) = G.subgraph(); and subgraph() returns a Graph& On 7 abr, 21:04, "James C. Sutherland" wrote:

On Apr 7, 2009, at 4:59 PM, fabricio wrote:

...

typedef subgraph< adjacency_list > Graph;

...

Graph G;

...

what I want is to create a:

...

vector< Graph& > subG;

...

but the usage of & here is illegal.

Why not use pointers?         vector subG; or         vector< boost::shared_ptr<Graph> > subG; _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-us...@lists.boost.orghttp://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users