Re: [Boost-users] thread_safe_signals API diffs?

On Wednesday 02 January 2008 17:55 pm, Nat Goodspeed wrote:

Thanks! Some of my colleagues are eager to switch to thread_safe_signals. If there are ways we should constrain our current use of the signals library to make that future conversion easier, I'd like to know them.

I've added an entry to the FAQ summarizing the changes from Boost.Signals 1.34, see: http://www.comedi.org/projects/thread_safe_signals/libs/thread_safe_signals/... -- Frank