It sure would be nice to have a "boost-level" C++ library for xml but I'm not sure we could sell the idea that it should be "part of" C++. Hope I'm wrong.
Isn't the purpose of Boost to bring C++ on par with library rich languages like Java? And then, to be a sandbox for features that may eventually be standardized? In that order? One of the project founders I'm sure will step in here and straighten me out. - cdr ----- Original Message ----- From: <dick.bridges@tais.com> To: <Boost-Users@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Friday, July 26, 2002 2:21 PM Subject: RE: [Boost-Users] XML Xerces is ok for xml+namespaces but if you want to use additional facilities (e.g., XPath, XSLT, etc.) you'll have to go to other packages like Xalan. Unfortunately, the Xerces and Xalan projects don't appear to be all that well co-ordinated. Makes it difficult to stay both current and compatible. It sure would be nice to have a "boost-level" C++ library for xml but I'm not sure we could sell the idea that it should be "part of" C++. Hope I'm wrong. schalk_cronje@na i.com To: Boost-Users@yahoogroups.com cc: 07/26/2002 10:14 Subject: RE: [Boost-Users] XML AM Please respond to Boost-Users
I'm writing an XML based project right now. I haven't been able to find any good, open source XML parser to incorporate into my application, so I
What's wrong with Xerces? Info: <http://www.boost.org> Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ Info: <http://www.boost.org> Wiki: <http://www.crystalclearsoftware.com/cgi-bin/boost_wiki/wiki.pl> Unsubscribe: <mailto:boost-users-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/