OK..... It seems you are correct. Does it strike anyone else that this is a REALLY REALLY bad design? Boost 1.35 used to make just fine if you changed user.hpp. We use only dlls here. I NEVER want a static lib, since threads shouldn't build static lib, why is this define effecting the thread build? Larry E. Ramey Steven Watanabe wrote:
AMDG
Larry E. Ramey wrote:
I can't build the thread library. I have no idea why. ( What gregorian date is doing in the thread lib eludes me )
I have changed boost/config/user.hpp to #define BOOST_ALL_DYN_LIN, of course, that shouldn't effect threads.... but whatever....
This is the problem. If you don't need other changes to user.hpp, you can suppress it with bjam ... define=BOOST_NO_USER_CONFIG for building the thread library.
In Christ, Steven Watanabe
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users