On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 12:01 PM, Ravi
On Sunday 31 January 2010 13:37:08 Emil Dotchevski wrote:
Note that by design, the diagnostic_information message is not intended to be user-friendly. However I will accept any patches that improve the output from diagnostic_information, not only in terms of prettifying the mangled names but also including more diagnostic information, even if it is platform-specific.
Is there a reason not use the following directly? http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_41_0/boost/units/detail/utility.hpp
OK, trunk revision 59398 uses boost/units/detail/utility.hpp for demangling type names used in diagnostic_information (except under rtti=off). We should probably do a mini-review and make this an official utility function. Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode