I am not that big expert in CppUnit. If you could provide a feature list for CppTest I may do feature by feature comparison. But from what I view after perfunctory look on docs the feature lists seems incomparable. Though again I may be wrong.
Hi Gennadiy, I'd be happy to provide you with a feature list. It may take a day or two. Boost typically provides libraries that beat the pants off anything else out there, and I'm sure that you're working to make Boost::Test the best unit testing framework available for C++. However, unlike many of the other libraries that Boost provides, a reasonably functional and popular substitute (CppUnit) existed. I'm curious as to what led you to write your own rather than contribute to CppUnit and try to get it incorporated into Boost (similar to how Spirit was incorporated)? Do you have different design goals for Boost::Test? cheers, Jon -- Jon Stewart stew1@ellipsis.cx