data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d500a/d500a077604fda5a1877438e0a3f12f0e2ffef0e" alt=""
Sohail Somani wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of David Klein
Sohail Somani wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org [mailto:boost-users-bounces@lists.boost.org] On Behalf Of mark cox
wow, this seems like a great idea, a scoped_ptr with deleter would be v.useful. mark
I've been thinking something like (just something I hacked
together just
now). Not sure if there is a nicer way.
[snip]
+1 vote for this idea :)
i actually kind of did this for my current project, because i needed a custom deleter for scoped_ptr, when shared_ptr was to much overhead...
As did I, but it was not for performance but for readability. Shared pointers mean... Shared. Scoped don't. _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users
yep exactly, thatswhy i "ripped" scoped_ptr out of boost and added my custom_deleter stuff. (i only *thought* about shared_ptr to do the job) so are there any objections about adding this feature to scoped_ptr? -- regards dave