26 Jul
2007
26 Jul
'07
6:01 p.m.
On Jul 26, 2007, at 1:27 PM, Tim St. Clair wrote:
I agree w/Graham & Lothar, and it seems rather silly to stifle C+ +0x on such a debate.
I understand the reasoning behind it, but at the same time one must also weigh the costs of being pedandtic about such things. What if C++0x *did not* have thread support, because the committee could not agree on some ideas? From my perspective, I think that would be a bad decision.
The C++ committee will not ship the C++0x standard without thread support, period. They'll argue, they'll haggle, but in the end we'll get *something*. - Doug