Hi,
I am a little confused about how to make 'interprocess_mutex' part of the
'managed_shared_memory' object which actually represents the shared_memory?
Is there a base class or something that can take the mutex?
I placed an '*interprocess_mutex*' as a member variable *in the class that
contains my 'managed_shared_memory'* object as a member variable and was
locking it in the methods that accessed the shared memory. I guess this did
not work out as I believe what I did effectively locked the object of my
class that was holding the embers. And since this is not actually the shaed
resource between the processes it didn't work out..
I'd really appreciate if you could provide an example of just show me bbased
on my initial code.. how the 'managed_shared_memory' can be locked using the
mutex.
Sreenu
On 1/9/08, Srinivas Gardas
Hi Ion, Probably that's the reason.. I haven't used any mutexes thought it's all implemented in the 'interprocess'. I am kind of new to this stuff.. Could please give me a code example where 'interprocess_mutex' is used by a 'Server' and 'Client' to lock the managed_shared_memory ?
I really appreciate your help.
Thanks & Regards Sreenu
On 1/8/08, Ion Gaztañaga
wrote: Hi, I am facing an issue with the 'Shared Memory File'.. Sometimes I get
'SharedMemory File Name' as the first element of the structure that I used, to create a 'interprocess::list' and when this happens, it means that
SharedMemory got corrupted and my program crashes. Has anyone faced
Srinivas Gardas escribió: the the this
issue, or does anyone know what might be wrong?
I don't see any problem with your approach, can you give me more information? Also, take in care that you need to use mutexes to protect concurrent accesses to the list (an interprocess_mutex constructed in the segment should work).
Regards,
Ion _______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users