9 Feb
2012
9 Feb
'12
12:35 p.m.
On 08/02/2012 14:39, Jeff Flinn wrote:
Do you mean the 1_49_0 beta based on the lib names above? There was some discussion recently on the dev list about this but I don't remember which lib[s] were involved. I thought the were going to fix it in the 1.49 release which is a few weeks away. I was using svn head, but just tried against 1_49_0_beta1. Same bug occurs. If it were fixed in 1.49 that would be great news for me!
Crispin -- Dr Crispin Cooper Sustainable Places Research Institute Cardiff University