3 Jun
2008
3 Jun
'08
8:47 p.m.
ok, I understand now. Indeed, "variadic" was misleading.
Thanks for your help.
On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Steven Watanabe
AMDG
Istvan Buki wrote:
thank you very much for your nice and clean solution. May I ask you to post the variadic version as it is, even if it doesn't compile. I'll try to find how to make it work. It will give me a good starting point to learn more about these techniques.
Just take the numbers off of the functions at_key1 and at_key2, so that they are overloaded. I suppose that variadic is not really the right term for this...
In Christ, Steven Watanabe
_______________________________________________ Boost-users mailing list Boost-users@lists.boost.org http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost-users